Cursor Agent Mode in Practice: 10 Tips I Learned the Hard Way Over Three Months

2 AM. I’m staring at the fifth broken file Agent just generated, taking a deep breath. This is the third time tonight I’ve had to refactor this feature. I’m starting to wonder—is this “automatically complete complex tasks” Agent mode here to help me, or torture me?
Three months ago, when I first spotted the Agent mode toggle in Cursor, I was as excited as if I’d discovered a new continent. The vision was beautiful: tell the AI what you need, it automatically creates files, installs dependencies, writes code, fixes bugs—all while you sip coffee and wait for results. Reality was harsh: it does work automatically, but often automatically messes things up.
But honestly, after three months of trial and error, my relationship with Agent has finally evolved from “love-hate drama” to “smooth partnership.” It’s now my most capable assistant—as long as you know how to work with it. In this article, I want to share all the pitfalls I’ve stepped in and lessons I’ve learned, so you don’t have to stare at your screen in despair at 2 AM.
What is Agent Mode: Understanding the Difference from Regular Chat
When you open Cursor’s Composer, you’ll see an “Agent” toggle in the upper right. Don’t underestimate this switch—turning it on is like giving AI hands and feet.
In regular mode, AI can only give you suggestions, telling you “you should add a function here” or “this bug might be because…” and then wait for you to manually act. Agent mode? It gets to work directly: creating files, modifying code, installing npm packages, running commands—all in one go.
Sounds great, right? But that’s also where the problem lies. Imagine assigning an intern to modify code—they do modify it, but then you look and think “wait, why did they change other files too? Why is the core logic different?” Agent is like that enthusiastic but not-quite-reliable intern.
So my current approach: use Chat for small tasks (like “explain this code snippet”), use Agent for multi-file operations (like “add TypeScript types to all components”). The key is knowing when to delegate and when to supervise closely.
Tip 1: The Art of Task Breakdown—Don’t Let Agent Bite Off More Than It Can Chew
My biggest mistake was throwing huge tasks at Agent all at once.
One time I wanted to refactor an old project and told Agent straight up: “Help me migrate this project from JavaScript to TypeScript, optimize performance while you’re at it, and add a login feature.” The result? It started creating files like crazy, modified things for ages, and the project completely broke. I spent a whole day rolling back code.
I learned my lesson. Now I break it down like this:
- Round one: “First add TypeScript types to files in the src/components directory”
- Round two: “Handle type definitions for src/utils”
- Round three: “Configure tsconfig.json and make sure it compiles properly”
After each step, I run tests to confirm everything’s fine before continuing. This way, if something goes wrong, I can quickly pinpoint which step caused it.
Here’s a tip: when breaking down tasks, try to keep each task’s impact to 3-5 files max. Beyond that, Agent easily loses focus. Just like you wouldn’t ask an intern to modify 20 files at once, right? Same principle.
Tip 2: Context Management—Tell Agent What to Look At
Agent has a quirk: it doesn’t know which files are important and which should be ignored. Your project might have thousands of files, with node_modules taking up half of them. If Agent scans all of those, not only is it painfully slow, it’s also easily distracted.
Now before I start any Agent task, I do two things:
Step One: Configure .cursorignore
This file tells Cursor which directories to skip indexing. My template looks like this:
node_modules/
dist/
build/
.next/
.git/
*.log
coverage/With this in place, Agent’s response speed can improve by over 30%. Don’t underestimate this time—it adds up over a day.
Step Two: Use @ Symbol for Precise References
When I need Agent to modify specific files, I use @filename to explicitly provide context. For example: “Following the pattern in @api.ts, add error handling to @user.ts too.” This way Agent doesn’t go searching all over the place.
One time I didn’t use @, just said “follow the pattern in the API file.” Result? It found a two-year-old file and modified everything based on that outdated pattern. That was… something.
Tip 3: Version Control is Your Lifeline
I learned this tip through blood and tears.
One Friday afternoon, I had Agent help me refactor a module, then went to a meeting. When I came back, Agent had modified over 30 files. I thought “great, very efficient.” Then during evening testing, the login feature was broken.
Problem was—I didn’t remember which files it had changed.
I spent three hours that night comparing files one by one to locate the issue. Since then, I made myself an iron rule: always commit before using Agent.
My workflow now looks like this:
# Commit before starting
git add .
git commit -m "Backup before using Agent"
# Then let Agent do its thing
# Check changes afterward
git diffIf Agent messes up, just git reset --hard to roll back and start fresh. This has saved me countless times.
Also, here’s another tip: have Agent modify only one functional module at a time, commit immediately after. That way if something goes wrong, the rollback cost is minimal. Like saving frequently in a game—you can never save too often.
Tip 4: Learn to “Stop”—Don’t Let Agent Keep Digging When It Errors
Agent has a trait: once it starts working, it keeps charging ahead. Even if it errors midway, it pushes through stubbornly, getting more and more off track.
The most extreme case I saw: Agent couldn’t find a dependency, so it created a fake one, then continued writing code based on that fake dependency. By the time I noticed, it had modified over a dozen files based on that false premise.
Now I’ve learned to “supervise.” When Agent starts working, I watch its output log:
- See red errors? Hit ESC immediately to stop
- See it creating weird files? Stop right away
- See it modifying core logic it shouldn’t? Halt decisively
After stopping, I check what it’s already done and assess:
- If the changes are decent, keep that part and adjust instructions to continue
- If it’s already gone off track, git reset directly and give new instructions
Don’t feel bad about interrupting it. Agent isn’t human—it won’t get upset about being interrupted. If you wait for it to fully implement the wrong logic, the cleanup work will be much larger.
Tip 5: Never Blindly Trust Agent’s Code
Honestly, Agent-generated code quality is like a mystery box—sometimes it pleasantly surprises you, sometimes it horrifies you.
When I first started using Agent, I had this illusion: AI is so smart, the code it writes should be fine, right? Well, after the test environment crashed twice, I learned—code review is a step you can’t skip.
Now after Agent completes any task, I do these things:
Step One: Run Tests
npm testBasic operation, but many people forget. Agent won’t automatically run tests for you—it just writes the code and considers it done.
Step Two: Code Review Checklist
I made myself a checklist:
- ✓ Logic correctness: Does the functionality work as expected
- ✓ Edge cases: Are null values and exceptions handled
- ✓ Performance issues: Any obvious performance bottlenecks
- ✓ Code style: Does it follow project conventions
- ✓ Security risks: Any SQL injection, XSS vulnerabilities
Step Three: Check If It Cut Corners
Agent has a habit of taking shortcuts. For example, you ask it to “optimize database queries” and it might just add caching without actually optimizing the SQL itself. You need to carefully check what it actually changed and whether it truly solved the problem.
One time I discovered Agent skipped a complex business logic with // TODO: implement later. Hey, pretty clever—leaving the pit for me to fill.
Tip 6: The Right Way to Use Agent in Large Projects
In small projects, Agent is basically overpowered. But large projects are different—hundreds of files, complex dependencies, multi-developer code styles—Agent gets confused easily.
I have a Next.js project with over 200 components in the codebase. Initially I opened Agent and told it to “optimize performance for all components.” It spent ten minutes just finding files, then only modified a few insignificant places without touching any core components.
Later I figured out an approach for large projects:
Strategy 1: Process by Module
Don’t make Agent face the entire project—give it a defined scope. For example:
- “Only handle files in the
src/components/authdirectory” - “Only modify code related to user login”
This way Agent’s attention is focused and it won’t be distracted by unrelated code.
Strategy 2: Use .cursorrules to Set Boundaries
Create a .cursorrules file in the project root to tell Agent the project rules:
# Project Rules
- All components must use TypeScript
- API calls must use @/lib/api
- Do not modify core logic in @/lib/core directory
- New files must include JSDoc commentsWith these rules, Agent won’t go rogue. Like giving an intern a “Development Guidelines” document—while it can’t guarantee full compliance, at least there’s a reference standard.
Strategy 3: Prioritize Independent Modules
Large projects always have relatively independent modules, like utility functions and common components. These are great places for Agent to shine—if it breaks them, the impact is limited; if it improves them, the whole project benefits.
Tip 7: The Golden Combination of Agent and Composer
Many people don’t understand the relationship between Agent and Composer. Actually they’re meant to work together, not either/or.
Simply put: Composer is the workbench, Agent is the automation switch.
My current approach:
Scenario 1: Multi-file Refactoring = Composer + Agent ON
When I need to modify multiple related files simultaneously, I turn on Agent mode in Composer. For tasks like “add error handling and retry logic to all API calls,” these cross-file batch operations are where Agent mode really boosts efficiency.
Scenario 2: Single-file Deep Modification = Composer + Agent OFF
If I’m just modifying complex logic in one component, I turn off Agent and use regular Composer. This way AI gives suggested code and I manually apply it, with better control over each step.
Scenario 3: Quick Question = Chat
When I just want to ask “what does this error mean” or “how to optimize this code,” I use Chat directly—opening Composer feels like overkill.
Here’s a practical tip: in Composer, you can toggle the Agent switch anytime. Start with it on to let it work, then if you notice something’s off, turn it off to take back control. Switch flexibly rather than stubbornly sticking to one approach.
Tip 8: Pitfalls to Absolutely Avoid
After using Agent for so long, I’ve summarized several common pitfalls. Not saying you absolutely can’t do these, but think twice before you do.
Pitfall 1: Letting Agent Operate Databases Directly
One time I took a shortcut and told Agent “help me clean duplicate records in the test database.” It did clean them—along with production data. Why? My .env was configured with the production database connection, and it won’t switch environments for you.
Lesson: For database operations, do them yourself, or at least back up first.
Pitfall 2: Modifying a Pattern Across All Files at Once
“Change all var to let in all files” sounds simple, right? But Agent might change var in comments, strings, even third-party libraries. The result: code runs, but there are mysteriously weird changes everywhere.
Safer approach: have it change one directory first, verify it’s correct, then expand the scope.
Pitfall 3: Unleashing Agent in a Project Without Tests
I relate to this deeply. Had an old project without tests, let Agent refactor it thoroughly. Looked fine after changes, went live and three features broke. Without tests as a safety net, you have no idea what problems Agent introduced.
So: either write tests first, or take small steps with manual verification. Don’t go all-in.
Pitfall 4: Over-relying on Agent
The biggest pitfall is actually mindset. Use it long enough and you’ll become dependent, your first reaction to problems being “let Agent help me.” But some problems really need you to think through yourself. I’ve seen people ask Agent even for variable naming—that’s a bit much.
Agent is a tool, not a babysitter. It can boost efficiency but can’t replace thinking.
Tip 9: Little Tricks to Make Agent Run Faster
Agent sometimes is frustratingly slow. Just modifying a few files yet you wait forever. Actually there are optimization methods to speed it up considerably.
Trick 1: Narrow Indexing Scope
The .cursorignore mentioned earlier is basic. Beyond that, you can adjust the Codebase indexing range in settings. I generally only index core directories like src/ and lib/, excluding documentation, config files, etc.
Trick 2: Clear Chat History
Agent references previous conversation context. If chat history is too long, it reviews everything each time, naturally slowing down. I’ve developed a habit: after completing a big task, start a new conversation. Like clearing a shopping cart—travel light.
Trick 3: Use Faster Models
Cursor defaults to GPT-4, high quality but slow. For simple tasks (like batch renaming, code formatting), you can switch to Claude Sonnet or GPT-3.5, doubling the speed.
My principle: use GPT-4 for complex logic to be safe, use fast models for simple tasks for speed.
Trick 4: Batch Process Rather Than Changing Everything at Once
Need to add comments to 100 files? Don’t have Agent change them all at once. Split into 5 batches of 20 each, checking in between. This not only catches problems early, but Agent processes smaller context each time, making it faster.
Simply put, Agent needs optimization too. You wouldn’t let a query do a full table scan, right? Lighten Agent’s load and it runs better.
Tip 10: My Agent Usage Checklist
After using it this long, I’ve made myself a checklist. Before starting Agent, I scan through it:
Before Starting Task:
- ✓ Git is committed, working directory clean
- ✓
.cursorignoreis configured - ✓ Task scope is clear (which files will be affected)
- ✓ Confirm current branch (don’t modify directly on main)
- ✓ Test environment ready (can verify promptly)
During Agent Execution:
- ✓ Monitor output logs, stop immediately upon seeing anomalies
- ✓ Watch file changes, prevent mistaken core logic modifications
- ✓ If direction deviates, decisively ESC to stop
- ✓ Execute complex tasks step-by-step, don’t be greedy
After Task Completion:
- ✓
git diffto check all changes - ✓ Run tests (
npm test) - ✓ Code review (logic, performance, security)
- ✓ Only commit after local testing passes
- ✓ Clean up unnecessary chat history
This checklist looks tedious, but it really can save you. Like a pilot’s pre-flight checklist—though you go through it every time, it prevents most accidents.
The most important one: Never let Agent make major changes on Friday afternoon. This is a lesson I learned through blood and tears—fixing bugs over the weekend really isn’t pleasant.
Conclusion
Back to that 2 AM scenario at the article’s beginning. The current me wouldn’t let Agent spiral out of control to generate five broken files. Because I know when to delegate and when to stop; know how to break down tasks and set boundaries; most importantly, I understand Agent isn’t magic—it’s just a tool that needs taming.
Three months of exploration, yielding these 10 tips. Honestly, Agent mode can truly double development efficiency—but only if you learn to work with it. It’s like an energetic but inexperienced intern—give it the right direction and it can help you get lots done; if you let it run wild, it can make your project a complete mess.
My advice: don’t fear the pitfalls, but always be ready to roll back. Start practicing with small tasks, slowly build trust. Once you develop chemistry with Agent, you’ll discover it’s truly a capable assistant.
Finally, a mindset to share: Agent is here to enhance your abilities, not replace your thinking. When facing problems, first think through how to solve them yourself, then decide whether you need Agent’s help. Maintain this mindset and you won’t be held hostage by the tool.
Oh, and if you’re just starting with Cursor Agent, remember to set up Git first. This really isn’t a joke—the peace of mind from being able to roll back will make you more willing to experiment.
Wishing you and Agent a pleasant collaboration. If you also have usage tips or pitfall experiences, feel free to share in the comments. After all, avoiding pitfalls together is better than everyone fumbling around separately.
FAQ
When should I use Agent mode versus regular Chat mode?
• Agent mode: Suited for multi-file operations (like batch adding TypeScript types, refactoring modules, installing dependencies)—Agent automatically creates, modifies files and executes commands
• Chat mode: Suited for specific questions (like explaining code, asking about errors, getting optimization suggestions)—only gives suggestions without auto-execution
• Regular Composer mode: Suited for deep single-file modifications—AI gives code suggestions, you manually control each step
Key decision criterion: If you need to change 3+ files, use Agent; otherwise Chat or regular Composer is safer and more controllable.
Why is git commit absolutely necessary before using Agent?
• Quick rollback: If Agent messes up 30 files, manually restoring is nearly impossible—git reset --hard gets you back to the starting point
• Clear comparison: git diff precisely shows what Agent changed, preventing missed review items
• Psychological safety: Knowing you can roll back anytime, you'll be more willing to try complex tasks without hesitation
Recommended workflow: commit before changes → Agent executes → git diff to check → commit after tests pass → reset directly if problems arise. Like game saves—you can never save too often.
If red errors appear during Agent execution, should I stop immediately?
• Agent won't auto-correct: It continues executing based on the error, getting more off-track (like creating fake dependencies when it can't find one)
• Early damage control: Stopping at step 3 error only requires rolling back 3 steps; waiting for it to complete 20 steps based on errors means massive cleanup
• Readjust approach: After stopping, assess completed parts, adjust instructions and re-execute—more efficient than letting it charge ahead
Supervision strategy: Watch output logs, stop immediately upon anomalies (red errors, weird file creation, core logic modification)—don't hesitate to interrupt.
Does .cursorignore configuration really speed things up by 30%? How exactly to configure?
```
node_modules/
dist/
build/
.next/
.git/
*.log
coverage/
.vscode/
```
Speed boost principles:
• Agent defaults to scanning all files to build context—node_modules alone might have thousands of files
• After exclusion, indexing scope shrinks by 90%, naturally faster retrieval
• Also prevents Agent from being distracted by third-party library code, improving modification accuracy
Configuration location: Create .cursorignore file in project root, syntax same as .gitignore.
How to determine if a task is suitable for Agent to handle?
Step One: Check impact scope
• 3-5 files or less: suitable for Agent
• Over 10 files: split the task first
• Involves core logic: use cautiously, preferably manual handling
Step Two: Check task type
• Suitable: batch renaming, adding type annotations, code formatting, installing dependencies
• Unsuitable: complex business logic, database operations, security-related changes
Step Three: Check safety measures
• Has test coverage: use confidently
• No tests + no Git: don't use
• Friday afternoon: absolutely don't use (hard-learned lesson)
Remember: Agent is a tool not magic—suitable for repetitive, well-defined tasks, not for complex logic requiring deep thinking.
For large projects (200+ files), Agent is always slow or modifies wrong places. What to do?
Strategy 1: Process by module
• Define scope clearly: "Only handle src/components/auth directory"
• Avoid global instructions: "Optimize all components" is too broad, Agent gets lost
Strategy 2: Configure .cursorrules
Create rules file in project root:
```
- All components must use TypeScript
- Do not modify @/lib/core directory
- API calls must use @/lib/api
```
Strategy 3: Use @ symbol for precise references
• Correct: "Following @api.ts pattern, add error handling to @user.ts"
• Wrong: "Follow API file pattern" (Agent will find wrong file)
Strategy 4: Prioritize independent modules
Utility functions, common components—these loosely-coupled modules are perfect for Agent; breaking them has small impact.
Does Agent-generated code need full manual review? Any quick checking methods?
Layer One: Automated checks (30 seconds)
```bash
npm test # Run tests
npm run lint # Code style check
git diff --stat # See which files changed
```
Layer Two: Quick scan (2-3 minutes)
• Check git diff output, focus on core logic changes
• Look for TODO, FIXME comments (evidence of Agent cutting corners)
• Confirm file additions/deletions are reasonable
Layer Three: Deep review (for critical parts)
• Edge case handling: null, undefined, empty arrays
• Performance issues: nested loops, repeated queries
• Security risks: SQL injection, XSS vulnerabilities
Don't blindly trust—Agent code quality is like a mystery box. But you don't need to check every line—focus on key areas.
15 min read · Published on: Jan 14, 2026 · Modified on: Feb 4, 2026
Related Posts
AI Keeps Writing Wrong Code? Master These 5 Prompt Techniques to Boost Efficiency by 50%

AI Keeps Writing Wrong Code? Master These 5 Prompt Techniques to Boost Efficiency by 50%
Cursor Advanced Tips: 10 Practical Methods to Double Development Efficiency (2026 Edition)

Cursor Advanced Tips: 10 Practical Methods to Double Development Efficiency (2026 Edition)
Complete Guide to Fixing Bugs with Cursor: An Efficient Workflow from Error Analysis to Solution Verification


Comments
Sign in with GitHub to leave a comment